Reminiscing

I spent a couple hours last night, and a few more this morning, thumbing through old notebooks and journals. I doubt anyone who writes can resist an occasional glance back at accumulated material; I can’t. The catch is, three things can happen when you do, and only one of them is good.

Getting the bad ones out of the way:

  • You find stuff so bad you don’t want to admit it’s your own. “Me? Write that crap? No, I couldn’t have. Must have copied it out as an example of what not to do….” Yet there it is, and your deep dark perversely honest inner self says, “Yup. It’s yours.”

  • While that is vexing, or embarrassing, it’s less frustrating than this: you find stuff whose provenance remains a mystery. There are two sub-categories here.

    • One, it’s good, but you’re not sure whether you wrote it, or copied it and neglected to cite the source. Result: you have a good piece you’d like to tell someone about, but you can’t be absolutely positively confident you wrote it yourself. (If you’ve not written a lot of different stuff, or if you have a strong clear style from which you never stray, you might not believe this.)

    • Two, it’s good, and you know you didn’t write it, but you’ve no idea who did, or how to track it down.

And the one good possibility? It does happen, though not as often as you’d like, that you find stuff so good you actually smile, or sigh, or otherwise tell yourself that, even had someone else written it, you’d have to say it was good.

Advertisement
Previous Post
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • Shameles Self-promotion

    I've written at least four novels so far. One was awful and will never again be read by human eyes. The second was not so bad, but not so good. The third and fourth are murder mysteries, as will be the next two (I think). One more -- dangerously close to "literary" -- may not get finished before I am. But as for those murder mysteries, you can read about them, and order the first, by clicking on the image below. (It's the cover of the e-book.)

    Link to e-books

  • The Court and Citizens United

    Senator Bernie Saunders, at The Guardian: "At a time when corporations have more than $2tn in cash in their bank accounts, make record-breaking profits and swarm Washington with their lobbyists 24 hours a day, seven days a week, for the highest court in the land to suggest that there is just not enough corporate "speech" in our system defies the bounds of reason and sanity."
  • The Supreme Bowl

  • It’s one of the commandments

  • Dynastic Duo

  • What Happens in War

    Thomas Ricks in Foreign Policy: "What urinating Marines did was wrong, but hardly shocking in the context of what goes on in war -- especially in Afghanistan. I remember reading in a history of fighting in Waziristan that British officers were warned that if they were captured, Pushtun fighters likely would jam a sprig of camelthorn up the captive's penis and then tie him naked and spreadeagled over and anthill and leave him there to roast in the sun until he died. Given the historical memory of Afghans, I would expect that knowledge of those practices is widespread."

  • Today’s Fascists

    Chris Hedges, at TheChristianLeft: "Dr. James Luther Adams, my ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School , told us that when we were his age… we would all be fighting the 'Christian fascists.' The Nazis, he said, were not going to return with swastikas and brown shirts. Their ideological inheritors had found a mask for fascism in the pages of the Bible."

  • Global Stability

    Zbigniew Brzezinski in The American Interest: "[C]omprehensive social progress is more enduringly attained by democratic participation than by authoritarian mobilization, [and] in our time global stability can be promoted only by larger-scale cooperation, not through the imperial domination prevalent in earlier historical epochs."

  • The New Realities

    Andrew Bacevich, at TomGram,: "Did 9/11 change everything? For a brief period after September 2001, the answer to that question seemed self-evident: of course it did, with massive and irrevocable implications. A mere decade later, the verdict appears less clear. Today, the vast majority of Americans live their lives as if the events of 9/11 had never occurred."

  • Archives